Senna
(2010, Asif Kapadia)
Anyone
familiar with the Formula 1 racing championship and its history is
aware of the name Ayrton Senna. Ayrton is today considered a legend,
fondly remembered by fans of sport and former drivers alike. During
his all too briefly illustrious career, Senna was quite the
controversial figure, with his detractors equally vocal as his
supporters, especially his closest rivals during the races
themselves. Documentary filmmaker Asif Kapadia offers a relatively
insightful glimpse into this unique figure, delivering a film
constructed exclusively out of archival footage and family home
videos, with the occasional voice over courtesy of past interviews.
Ayrton
Senna was born in 1960 in Brazil. His love for racing started at an
early age, and his chances at a professional career took flight in
the late 1970s as he piloted the equivalent of go-cart vehicles in a
much smaller league than what F1 had to offer. He was a phenomenal
driver, if a little too reckless at times. His success meant
graduation to Formula 1 by 1984 during which season he drove for
Toleman. After a brief spell with Lotus from 1985 to 1987, the crux
of his story, of his legend rather, began in earnest upon joining
McLaren in 1988, thus teaming up with one of the greats at the time,
Frenchman Alain Prost. Whereas Senna was driven by speed, courage and
what he deemed some sort of divine guidance, Prost was the consummate
professional and understood the ins and outs of the sport, both in
regards to what had to be done on the track purely for victories and
anything related to points standings and various other more
politically related details. Was the blazing up and comer to soften
his touch under the guidance of Prost? Not at all, which of course
meant a rift between the two was eventual. While in Prost's eyes
Senna was far too cocky and reckless, in the eyes of many others
Senna only grew greater as not only the individual wins piled up, but
so did the season championships...
It
felt nearly impossible to head into Asif Kapadia's Senna
without prior knowledge of how the film was put together, that being
by pulling together various archival footage, be it from sports casts
or from personal family footage, and gluing them in such a fashion,
without the assistance of recently recorded talking head interviews
to use as a spine, that a cohesive story can be told. Reading and
listening to the comments shared by several who chose to point that
out, it seemed as though that in of itself was worthy of the highest
of praise. One wonders if such people follow any kind of professional
sporting events throughout one or multiple seasons. For starters, any
big event or series of events will have literally countless cameras
recording video or taking snapshots of said event. The staggering
amount of visual documentation for merely one race would be enough to
fill en entire library. The absence talking heads is admittedly an
interesting directorial decision, but not one that will drop the jaws
of anybody who understands how detailed the recording a Formula 1
race is. There are interviews before races, after races, as well as
during the two weeks that separate the races, not only with the
drivers at the center of attention, but also the team owners, leaders
and even technicians if need be. In essence, there was certainly no
lack of material to build a reasonably cohesive story using only
archival footage. Having the Senna family give permission to allow
Kapadia to utilize personal home video footage is arguably the most
interesting coup the director accomplished, but it is not as though a
incredible amount is shown throughout the picture anyhow.
Additionally, while there are no talking head interviews, audio
archival interviews with Ayrton's sister and several people
associated with the profession accompany the movie and set certain
scenes into context.
What
matters in the case of Senna is what Kapadia does with the
aforementioned footage. In that regard, Senna is a compelling
drama about a special individual who particular quirks were made
known to the entire world given the vast, faithful F1 fan base. The
portrait of Senna shown to the viewer is that of a man who was deeply
compelled to race despite the odds, despite the risks, and despite
the criticism frequently aimed at him. At the time that his stardom
rose with McLaren (and teammate/enemy Alain Prost), the head of the
federation was also a Frenchmen, thus suspiciously leading to certain
race day decisions that would favour Alain over Ayrton. The
Brazilian's racing style was also conducive to various stressful
moments given his propensity to drive with madman speed. Granted, his
control over the vehicle was often quite good, there were the
inevitable contacts with other cars, which, has chance it would have
it, left his opponents' cars rather than his own in bad shape. The
passion for the sport never swayed, nor did his calm yet powerful
conviction in his talents as a driver, some of which he attributed to
the intervention of God Himself. One of the film's most awe inspiring
moments is when he finally won the Brazilian Grand Prix. Arriving at
the finish line well ahead of everybody else, his exaltation at
capturing victory in his homeland where people saw him practically as
a demi-god was so powerful that he experienced muscular tensions and
could not exit his car without the help of teammates! When in
interviews he comes off as somewhat shy, unsure of how to behave in
front of the camera. Clearly, his place in life was behind the
driver's seat. Like so many of the greats, he was a complicated man,
yet overall a very likable one.
Perhaps
Kapadia's film is not as complete as one would like it be. It alludes
to Ayrton's love of his native Brazil, which is of course an
important story element to establish when fleshing out the subject,
yet really only offers a cursory examination of his relation to its
people. Senna briefly touches on the fact that Brazil,
especially in those days, was a surprisingly poor nation despite its
worldwide popularity. His success on the international stage meant
resulted in two things. First, that most Brazilians, but in
particular the lower class, looked up to Ayrton with tremendous
pride. Second, Ayrton did invest some time and energy in charity work
for the youth struggling to get by in the lower socio-economic
classes. A little bit more of those two aspects would have completed
the image of Ayrton for the purpose of the film. Knowing that a star
is involved in charity is one thing, but when presented the
opportunity to explore it in film in the case of such a curious man
as Artyon Senna, it feels as though director Kapadia limits himself.
It is not that the viewer's understanding of the subject by the end
of the film is insufficient, only that some pertinent and directly
related topics are not explored as fully as otherwise could have been
the case and, in contrast, would have provided a more detailed, complete understanding.
Fans
of Formula 1 would do well to seek this one out. The documentary
provides a goldmine of both wonderful footage from races past and and
some interesting interviews with Senna himself. The centerpiece of
the film, the Senna-Prost rivalry, is definitely the most gripping
sequence, one that has a bittersweet payoff in the final scenes
following Ayrton's fatal crash at the 1994 San Marino Grand Prix,
which terrifyingly enough had also taken the life of another driver
during Saturday's pole positioning runs. The perfect documentary? Not
by a stretch, but a very solid one.
1 comment:
because the team included Dwain Chambers. Chambers is serving a two-year ban for steroid use. guidancesports.com Baitcasting Reel
Post a Comment