One knows exactly when it has happened. Any movie aficionado
is familiar with that odd feeling which takes over when one has watched a film
that manages to overcome its flaws and provide some solid entertainment despite
it all. There is no hiding that the film is imperfect. Some of the flaws may be
glaring, but what it does well, it does so marvellously. This sentiment fell upon
the author while watching this second entry in the Shaw Brothers Marathon, The One Armed Swordsman, from 1967. More
than once a sense of exhilaration washed over me like a tidal wave, which
thankfully made up for the moments when I could no believe the ridiculousness
of what transpired on screen. For this reason, I salute director Chang Che, who
pulls off quite the job even though his film is hampered by at times a strange
script and really bogus storytelling methods. Enough with the intro, let us get
into the juicy details.
Chang Che’s film shares the tale of Fang Kang (Jimmy Wang),
the son of a servant who gave up his life to protect his master, Qi Ru Er (Tien
Feng), when Kang was only a small boy. In paying respect to the request uttered by
the boy’s father in his last breath, Qi Ru takes Kang as a pupil and teaches
him the martial arts of his house, along with the other, more well off
students, or ‘brothers’ as they are called. Flash forward a good few years and
Kang is a young adult, a solid student, but scorned by his brothers for his
petty familial background. Qi Ru’s daughter, Pei Er (Angela Pan), takes a liking
to Kang, but cannot relinquish her own snobbish ways, and therefore never
succeeds in truly seducing Kang. In a fit of fury, she accidentally slices of
Kang’s arm one night in the forest as the two confront each other. Kang,
bloodied, severely injured and exhausted, is found by the peace loving Xiao Man
(Lisa Chiao Chiao) who nurses him back to health. Kang is living a peaceful
life until the day he finds out that his former master’s old enemies, Smiling
Tiger (Tang Ti) and Long Armed Devil (Yeung Chi-hing), are planning to attack
the man on his 55th birthday. Kang is compelled to return to his
previous home to help out, but how can he do so with only one arm?
As stated in the introductory paragraph, my feelings and
thoughts towards The One Armed Swordsman
can easily be divided into two halves. Luckily, what works well did so
sufficiently for the movie to be enjoyable at the end of the day, but by golly
does it ever make some silly decisions. While watching these Shaw Brothers
films, it has come to the my attention that few, if any, run at over 2 hours long. Many are around the 90 minute range. One of several possible reasons for
this rests with the sort of stories the filmmakers have to tell and the requirements
of offering elaborate, escapist action set pieces. By the 90 minute mark,
everything has been told and the viewer has been assaulted with enough bloody
good stunts and sword fights, sometimes literally bloody, which makes them even better. When the movies from this
studio start to flirt with the two hour mark, which is the case with the film
under currently under review, things can begin to feel needlessly stretched. The
individual moments might be alright, perhaps entertaining in their own right,
but in the grander scheme of things, especially with regards to story and
pacing, they feel superfluous. The One Armed Swordsman is fraught with sword
fights. It is loaded with sword fights. It is, abundant in sword fights. Sounds
like a beautiful thing upon considering that this is a Shaw Brothers
production, does it not? In some respects it is indeed a beautiful, joyous thing,
for all the skill and incredible cinematography involved (more on that later).
However, about ¾ of the fights develop in exactly the same fashion. Exactly the
same. At the risk of spoiling a bit of the film, the antagonists, Long Armed
Devil and Smiling Tiger, have developed a special sword, an instrument of
combat they baptise the ‘lock sword’ because it is melded in order to have a
unique mechanism at the tip of the blade to ‘lock’ an opponent’s blade. When
their opposite is no longer in control of their weapon, the villains then
extract a knife from their robes and gut the opponent to death. Brilliant
technique for a villain. It is an interesting way of using a little clever idea
and simple sword making technology in order to add another dimension, another
purpose, to a blade. Tiger, Devil and their henchmen then go on to surprise
attack Qi Ru’s disciples before launching a final assault on the grandmaster
himself on his birthday. The viewer is then shown attack, upon attack, upon
attack, which all end the same. It is perfectly alright to show this
audacious new battle strategy a couple of times, just so the audience knows what
is in store for the finale, but Chang Che gives so many identical fight scenes
that it really gets boring after a while. The climax itself is even more
frustrating in that Kang comes to rescue just before Long Armed Devil is about
to vanquish the few remaining disciples and Qi Ru himself. Almost all of the disciples have needlessly died, falling prey to the same old strategy that no one seems to have figured out properly. Granted, Kang had to
do battle with Smiling Tiger on the way to Qi Ru’s home, but there is
nonetheless a sense of uncalled silliness to the entire affair. Every time a
disciple is killed, a few more then try to avenge them, only to have their
swords ‘locked’ as well, and so on and so forth... The One Armed Swordsman knows it has a unique idea about it pertaining
to the sword fighting, but it totally abuses it.
There are some more basic storytelling aspects that ring
hollow as well. Earlier in the film, Kang, prior to having his arm severed,
demonstrates admirable skill as a swordsman. This, of course, is after years of
practice under the tutelage of Qi Ru. Shortly after the infamous accident, when
attempting to defend his new girlfriend Xiao Man, Kang fails miserably. With only
one arm, all the techniques he has learned are proven useless. Because the
script demands it, Xiao Man is in possession of a half burned book about
martial arts, which she lends to Kang because he literally keeps moping about
how useless he has become since losing his arm (another element the film seems
determined to hammer into the viewer’s mind: look at how sad and useless Kang is
now!). A few weeks later, Kang is the most ruthless and efficient swordsman in
the entire land. Oh, really? So he needs years of training under a grandmaster
to become as good as he was when he had two arms, but a solo training with half burned book is
enough to make a total bad ass in the span of a couple weeks (maybe a few
months at most) when he has one arm? I know Shaw Brothers stories are not
supposed to be taken too seriously, but there is only so much I can get behind.
Now that the movie has been sufficiently beaten to a pulp,
it might be time to end the review on these positive aspects which have been mysteriously
referred to and which made the movie an enjoyable experience despite all the
problems analysed in the previous paragraphs. For one, even though the sword fights grow
repetitive after a while, they are really well acted out and filmed. Before
becoming tedious, there is a true sense of thrill and danger to the battles.
Every character who takes hold of a sword and waves around in attack or in
defence looks great doing just that. The eventual final battle between Kang and
Long Armed Devil is incredibly well done and features some inventive fighting moments
that were a pleasant surprise.
Earlier in the review, I referenced the sublime
cinematography. Is it ever gorgeous, and I am absolutely serious when typing
those very words. There are certainly
some Shaw Brothers productions that look more handsome than others, but among those this movie
fan has watched thus far, The One Armed
Swordsman is a cut above the rest. There is dynamic movement to the camera,
both during the calmer dialogue sequences and during the frenetic fights. Director
Chang Che has a perfect understanding of geography and space within a location,
of where characters are situation in relation to one another as well as in
relation to objects in the periphery, some of which can be used as weapons
themselves. The pans are nothing short of exquisite, and do a tremendous job at
conveying the emotions rushing through various scenes. It is true that I have
already written about how, in some ways, the film is poor at developing the
emotions, but I suppose I am forgiving the movie at this moment just for how
the director and his team use the cinematography to explore said emotions. Coupled with the lighting and set designs, both of which are fantastic, there is artistry in the cinematography, which is something I doubt can be so easily proclaimed about a lot of Shaw Brothers movies.
The central couple formed by Kang and Xiao Man is worthy
enough to cheer on. Both Jimmy Wang and Lisa Chiao Chiao give solid
performances. It is easy to imagine how those two would fall in love and want
to live a quiet, happy life together somewhere in the countryside on a farm.
Chang Che’s The One
Armed Swordsman is a curious case where it takes some seriously flawed
routes, more flawed than the often 'charming flaws' found in 60s and 70s Shaw
Brothers movies, but comes out on top nonetheless thanks to a few specific qualities
that struck perfect notes. In the end, the movie cannot earn a strong
recommendation on my part, but perhaps a mild one. I am aware that the film has
a serious fan base (a case in point being that Dragon Dynasty devoted a special
edition DVD with bonus material to it a few years ago, which I can respect. After all, a one
armed swordsman is a cool idea, and Jimmy Wang plays the part rather well. If
the film had not overstayed its welcome, I might have been more enthusiastic.
No comments:
Post a Comment