The
Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011, David Fincher)
There
are some phenomena in the entertainment industry which strike a nerve
among the populace with such ferocity that it creates a 'before and
after' effect. Star Wars (1977), Jurassic Park and
Avatar are such films.
They catch on like wild fire and never loosen their grip. It is
debatable whether or Stieg Larsson's The Girl with the
Dragon Tattoo book series fall
in such an illustrious category, although attempting to minimize the
magnitude of its popularity would be foolish. Since the first book's
publication in 2005, readers have devoured the stories of
anti-socialite, computer wizard Lisbeth Salander and grizzled veteran
journalist Mikael Blomqvist. The cultural impact of Larsson's
sprawling epics is not limited to the page, but expanded to the
screen as well. In 2009, a Swedish adaptation was incredibly well
received both in its native land and abroad (although its two
television bound sequels were not). Now arrives the bizarre English
language remake from David Fincher of Zodiac
and Seven fame.
Taking
course over a long period, Dragon Tattoo
tells the story of the unexpectedly productive alliance between the
two aforementioned characters, Lisbeth (Roony Mara) and Mikael
(Daniel Craig). The latter is a goth attired private investigator of
sorts, receiving payments from big industry players who want as much
information as possible dug up on various competitors or other
individuals which have caught their attention. At is revealed very
early on that her latest subject is Mikael, veteran journalist for
Millennium magazine whose most recent article, which tossed some
lofty accusations towards a successful business man, proved to be
complete hogwash, and although that small embarrassing detail was
never Mikael's intent, his career is now in considerable trouble. It
turns out that Lisbeth's investigation on Mikeal was for Mr. Vanger
(Christopher Plummer), former CEO of a large and proud Swedish
manufacturer who lives on a small little island a few hours outside
of Stockholm who wants to uncover the long overdue truth behind his
niece's disappearance 40 years ago. Officially, Mikael will be
preparing the Vanger family memoir, whereas in reality, his skills as
a journalist and investigator will be served to sniff who among the
conniving, untrustworthy, Nazi-loving members of Vanger's family
might have killed her. When the going gets tough, Mikael acquires
some help in shape of the very person who had him brought to Mr.
Vanger's attention, Lisbeth Salander.
Forgive
Between the Seats for providing such a lengthy, wordy plot synopsis
paragraph. It should be understood that if there is one thing Dragon
Tattoo indulges in (both this
film and the novel, which we have read), it is plot, thus making any
attempts to sum up, even briefly, what the film promises, is no
simple task. In this review's introductory paragraph, this movie was
characterized as 'bizarre.' A bit harsh, perhaps, but why bizarre?
For one, it plays a very dangerous game, one that brought upon the
quick and painless death of another recent English language remake,
Let Me In. Equally
similar to Matt Reeves' picture, this is a remake of a wildly
successful foreign language picture made very, very shortly after the
original. Another peculiar touch to Fincher's version of the same
story is that, unlike how most English language remakes (read:
American, for the the most part) are translated, in which the setting
is transported from whatever native country to the United States, the
action in this film still takes place in Sweden, only the characters
speak English. Fincher's track record helps us forgive the creation
of this movie, with the anticipation prior to its release achieving
pretty significant heights among the film fanatic community.
Nonetheless, making this movie, in particular with the way the story
is set, was a gamble.
Will
Dragon Tattoo receive
the same fate as the unfairly maligned Let Me In?
Most likely not. The cast is strong and people enjoy good pulpy fun
sometimes. Does it deserve a quick death like many people feverishly
believed Let Me In
did? Neither. In fact, David Fincher makes a surprisingly compelling
and effective film despite the mountains of plot details that need
balancing out. Watching and listening to the movie (meaning paying
attention to the plot, the cinematography, the colours, the score,
the live action sounds and so on), one feels as if Fincher, in trying
to adapt Larsson's famous book, has chosen to produce a hybrid of two
of his recent films, Zodiac
and The Social Network.
The attention the investigators Lisbeth and Mikael must pay towards
the details of the case and the lengths they each to go in order to
reach the truth is reminiscent of the prolonged journalistic research
performed in Zodiac. Then
come the visuals and sounds, which resemble, in subtle ways, the type
of film Fincher made with The Social Network.
There is a peculiar darkness to a lot of the picture, even during
scenes which take place in very well lit locations. Sometimes it is
omnipresent, other times it is barely hinted at, but that moody
pastiche is there to be sure. It does not come as such a surprise as
it did in his previous effort since this is, after all, a murder
mystery story, but nor is it unwelcome or lack style. In a curious
way, there are visual similarities between another film which came
out just recently, Tomas Alfredson's Tinker
Tailor Soldier Spy,
which also employed a subtle, reserved, beautiful visual tapestry to
help tell the story.
More
impressive than the film's attractive pictures are the performances
from the two leads, Rooney Mara and Daniel Craig. Mara has never,
until now, played anything character that remotely resembled the
audacious creature that is Lisbeth Salander. The difficulty in
bringing someone like that to life as a protagonist is in making her
the least bit believable and worthy of the viewer's attention.
Lisbeth, even though society has indeed treated her poorly, is a bit
of a psycho and she does not shy away from demonstrating just what
sort of insanity she is capable of. Mara succeeds in making her
impressive, scary, impulsive, adding intelligence, humour (albeit
slight and definitely off-kilter) and enviable determination in getting a job done. The girl
with the dragon tattoo is not the girl next door, let that be clear.
In the capable hands of Rooney Mara, she is someone audiences can
cheer for, even though she is freakishly weird. Craig is given what
might be seen as the 'boring' role, the straight man to Lisbeth's
flamboyancy. Appearances are deceiving in this case, since Mikael is
one of the more compelling mystery story protagonists in recent
memory. Considering the disastrous nature of his latest Millennium
article, he would be forgiven for coming across as a broken man. This
is not at all what the film has in store however, instead providing a
very honest, funny, charming and cunning investigator. The teaming up
of Lisbeth and Mikael defies expectations, creating a fascinating
one-two punch of detecting skills. Craig's work in Dragon Tattoo
just might be his very best.
Where
the film falters is in its detail heavy script. The source material
is entertaining, yet suffers from being overstuffed with story
threads. Fincher, unfortunately, chooses not to be as economical in
his storytelling as he could have been and, maybe, should have
been. The scenes which set up both Lisbeth and Mikeal (prior to their
unification) are fine individually, but there are so many of them and
none are ever genuinely connected to each other. Mikael simply
decides at one point, at least 50-60 minutes into the film, that he
needs help, which leads him to Lisbeth. 50-60 minutes is a lot of
time to be following two characters go on their separate ways when
the audience obviously knows that they shall form an alliance
eventually. Without giving too much away, there is yet another plot
point which demands resolving even after our two heroes have cracked
the case. Here again, the scenes themselves are fine but feel
ultimately unnecessary, as if Fincher and the screenwriters were convinced that as much of the book as possible had to be included into
the movie. There was certainly a way to make a perfect 2 hour long
cinematic version of this story. An opportunity missed, sadly.
A
visit to the multiplex this holiday season will provide a funny
selection of movies. Family entertainment like Tintin, the
crowd pleasing Mission Impossible, the adult minded Tinker
Tailor, and the dark, at times grizzly, gritty Dragon Tattoo.
No lack of choice, that much is certain. However, is it the best
choice? You do the investigating now...
2 comments:
i do agree that it was lengthy and was very detailed. i think, like you said, because the source material was just that. but i think it moved beautifully, until the end. :)
@Candice: For a director as skilled as Fincher, it was odd to see him fail at being economical. Parts of the film felt bloated, and I'm tempted to say that was the case at the beginning too, not just at the end, even though the first section does move along slightly better.
Post a Comment