Apart from the recent Festival du nouveau cinema, Between
the Seats has not been to the movies since September, believe it or not. Here is a
small sample of what little we did go see in theatres, as well as what we
caught on our favourite television channel, MPix.
Drive (2011,
Nicholas Winding Refn)
An unnamed man (Ryan Gosling) works during the daytime as a
stunt driver for movies as well as in a car repair garage for the kind man who
employed him, Shannon (Bryan Cranston). By night, however, he comes to the
assistance of robbers who require a getaway driver. Eventually, paying these
two roles proves far too dangerous, as they come crashing into one another,
putting not only himself in danger, but the pretty mother who lives down the
hall, Irene (Carey Mulligan).
Danish director Refn has garnered considerable praise for
his previous work, most notably the famous Pusher
trilogy. Unfortunately, we didn’t see said trilogy, but did review Valhalla
Rising earlier this year. I don’t know about the rest of you, but I could
detect the similarities between those two films, Drive and Valhalla. The
pacing is deliberately slow, very much so in fact. He definitely likes to test
his audience in that sense, which is a crying shame to write because I think
that 20 or 30 years ago a film like Drive
would have been considered by huge amounts of people as a rollicking good time.
It most certainly is, but for other reasons than merely the sporadic action
scenes. The emotional core of the film is remarkably strong, with Gosling and
Mulligan sharing memorable, if decidedly quiet chemistry on screen. There is a
bond between the two, but the return of Mulligan’s husband character halfway
through creates a significant barrier. However, the Gosling character,
realizing that the family may be in danger, chooses to help all of them,
including the husband. It’s a nice touch, indicating that Gosling’s character
is a force for good, period, regardless of the complications involved. It
simplifies things, him being just ‘good’ and all, but also complicates them
when he begins to display some of his more violent tendencies when coming to
the defence of the family. It’s all played creatively and with the right amount
of style. He’s the cute blond guy who will tear you freaking face off if you
make the wrong move. Lest we forget, the score/soundtrack is terrific. It is a
slow burn whose fire burns brightest. Well played, Refn, well played.
Contagion (2011,
Steven Soderbergh)
A mysterious and fatal flu virus which may or may not have
originated in China is spreading rapidly across the globe, killing hundreds of
people every day in several countries. The film follows the tribulations of the
doctors, health experts and ordinary citizens who must live with this stark new
reality in one way or another. Starring, get this, Matt Damon, Gwyneth Paltrow,
Kate Winslet, Laurence Fishburne, Marion Cotillard, John Hawkes, Jude Law and
even more people (like Bryan Cranston again)!
Oh, this is pretty darn good. Contagion turned out to be almost exactly how I hoped it would. The
movie is cold, both from an emotional and cinematography standpoint. It is
strictly concerned with how all sorts of people are confronted with the
propagation of a virus whose origins and structure are currently unknown, but
is spreading like wild fire would in a dry field. That in of itself is
terrifying because of its realistic nature. The fear of catching the disease is
far worse than the fear of having caught it, because in the latter situation
one knows they are already dead and done for. This fear of contagion is played
on in devilishly effective manner by, who else, Steven Soderbergh, who
demonstrates yet again his ability to bounce from genre to genre in near
effortless manner. This movie is so cold that is cares little about the fact
that big name stars are playing important characters. The virus doesn’t care
either. If it attaches itself to a given big name star, well, they’re dead. I
love big name actors, so it wasn’t as if I wanted to see them die, but it was
refreshing to watch a film that played things in as honest a manner as
possible. Another thing I liked about the picture was how there was not much in
the way of a plot. The ‘plot’ really is how the world is working on a cure and
how regular folk are surviving, if at all. It’s a very simple premise, but the
intricacies of the situation are complicated enough to actually make a
compelling feature-length film. It was filmed in IMAX too, which was how I saw,
and God is it ever brilliant when directors use IMAX properly. I saw this on
opening weekend, which was way back in early September, and it has stayed with
me vividly. Definitely one of the year’s best.
The Andromeda Strain
(1971, Robert Wise)
In the same vein as Contagion,
although on a smaller scale, a mysterious virus is claiming lives in the United
States. Those unfortunate enough to contact it have their blood turned to sand.
Eww! Four of that country’s best doctors and scientists are brought together at
a secret, ultra-sophisticated underground laboratory codenamed Wildfire to study
the virus and find a cure. The film stars Arthur Hill, Kate Reid, James Olsen
and David Wayne.
I was really with this film for the first half hour or so.
The nature of virus, when it was more unknown, was truly scary, as were some
scenes in which some doctors are exploring the region where they assume, for
time being, it originated. The awkward silence indicating death in a town which
was once vibrant...is always an effective storytelling device. Scenes also
transition from one to the next with the help of a very strange synthetic score
which sounds gave me the creeps as well. I think the film started to lose
points when the scientists enter the underground laboratory, Not that it
becomes a bad film, for it was still interesting enough, but the pace starts to
drag significantly. As the research and tests on the virus continue, there are
some exciting moments of discovery, and I would wager that the performances are
okay, maybe with the exception of Kate Reid, who gets into a very ‘sassy’ mood
all the way through, which got annoying by the end. And yet, there was
something about how it all played out which did not sit as well with me as I
would have liked. Strange that I would consider Contagion to be thrilling (and it is most definitely not and
thrill-a-minute movie) but find The
Andromeda Strain pretty boring at times. The film simply decides to make
odd choices, like the near 10 minute sequence when the four doctors must be
cleaned (via tremendously sophisticated technology) as they travel to each
successively lower underground level. Did we have to spend so much time seeing
them go through that process? There is a semi-twist near the end, although
anyone who has seen films in the same spirit as Andromeda can arguably guess it a long time before it is even
revealed. It’s alright, although I can’t
say I’m terribly enthusiastic about it.
2 comments:
Glad to see your praise of Contagion. It is one of those films that I feel got skimmed over by the film world for some reason, but it is a top notch film. Really effective as you say. Also glad to see you liked Drive so much. It is one of my favorite from the year so far, especially thanks to its style.
@Adam: Interesting to note is that 'Contagion' is still playing on the same IMAX screen on which it opened two months ago in my city. Evidently enough, there are at least some people seeing it.
I'd like to check out its end of the year gross. I wonder if the movie will have earned more money than we suspect, only that it did so in the slow and steady manner rather than what we are accustomed to reading about these days: an impressive opening weekend followed by a quick exit.
Post a Comment