Lone
Wolf and Cub: Sword of Vengeance (1972, Kenji Misumi)
Just
as comics and cowboys have been staples of Western entertainment for
decades, samurai and manga have earned a rightful spot in Japanese
culture. In fact, the sheer number of stories created for the
aforementioned black and white Japanese graphic novels is staggering.
Many have earned themselves significant reputations beyond the
borders of their native country, as have films depicting the exploits
of the samurai, be they of the legionary variety or master-less. It
comes as no surprise that the two have merged into one for numerous
books series. Among those that have reached degrees of popularity in
the West is Kazuo Koike's Lone Wolf and Cub, which shared the
tale of a former government employee who, after a shocking betrayal
leaves him without honour or a wife, traverses Japan on a quest to
right the wrongs done to him and his infant son, whom he brings along
in a baby carriage. In 1972, only two years after the story's initial
publication, the series was brought to the silver screen by director
Kenji Misumi, the first film titled Lone Wolf and Cub: Sword of
Vengeance.
Ogami
Itto (Tomisaburo Wakayama) is the Shogun's Second, or executioner.
Forget all notions of hooded, brutish oafs who dwell in the caves of
castle while awaiting for their next victims, being the Shogun's
executioner is an incredibly enviable and prestigious. It is so
prestigious in fact that members of a clan which rival's Ogami's, the
Yagyu, who apparently have legitimate links to the government (this
aspect of the tale is not explained very clearly, but one assumes
many people from many different families and clans align themselves
together to form governments) have conspired together and framed
Ogami. Latter is immediately accused of treachery against the Shogun
when law enforcement find an emblem of the Shogun planted on his
personal shrine, a sign that Ogami would, if it were true, being
praying for ills to befall their leader. Clearly this is all a
fabrication of the Yagyu clan, forcing Ogami to flee his own own with
his one year old son Daigoro, but not before his wife and servants
are butchered. Now, all that matters is destroying the Yagyu and
its leader, Retsudo (Tokio Oki).
A
film which, in the first five minutes, features a pseudo
rock-electronic score which announcing the passage of an unclean
ronin waving uncombed hair and walking around with a baby in a
makeshift wooden carriage decorated with a sign which reads 'Wolf
with Child in Tow: Child and Expertise for Rent' has made its
intentions plain and clear: Lone Wolf and Cub: Sword of
Vengeance is not going to be a very serious movie. Granted, in
some respects Akira Kurosawa's samurai films were not very serious,
but they nonetheless exuded a level of class denoting a high minded
craftsman was at work behind the camera. In the case of the film
under review today, director Kenji Misumi also displays some
craftsmanship, although it is for the purpose of creating what can
ostensibly be described as the Japanese-samurai equivalent of a
grindhouse picture. There is a griminess that covers the movie from
the first frame to the very last, if not always in the visuals
(although those do get quite grimy as well sometimes) then certainly
in the overall tone and attitude the film brings forth. Subtlety is
for the squeamish and the prudish. Misumi fully understands what sort
of tale Sword of Vengeance is and how it should, in all
likelihood, be presented on screen. The film plays like a balancing
act between being nasty and filthy while also pushing things, tonally
at least, in a direction which almost makes them comical. Much like
with the movies of grindhouse lore, the viewer might not always be
sure if the effect of a given moment is indeed supposed to be funny
or not. Limbs are sliced off in such cartoonish fashion, yet Sword
of Vengeance is playing it with as straight a face as possible.
Those looking for something fun if trashy should see their hunger
satisfied for the most part.
Kenji
Misumi and the cast construct a tale which fits comfortably into the
revenge genre, which can ultimately be considered a genre unto itself
given the near incalculable amount of entries it now owns. The
character of Ogami Itto is as stone faced as they come and does not
offer much in the way of dialogue, making a proper assessment of
actor Tomisaburo Wakayama performance somewhat difficult. He fits the
bill nicely enough, although it is rather strange to see a man as
chubby as him move like a cat against hoards of younger, leaner
warriors and thugs. Then again, that reality is probably more of a
testament to the titular wolf's skills as a swordsman than his
physical prowess. The only individual who seems to to giving anything
resembling a performance is actress Tomoko Mayam, who plays a whore
in a small mountain village Ogami heads to for a mission to destroy
potential usurpers to the throne. She is not in the film for very
long, but what little screen time is given to her, she uses as an
opportunity to craft some sense of realism to her character. It makes
for an odd little role. On the hand, the effort is nice, but on the
other, it feels peculiarly out of place in a film where almost
everybody is hamming it up to the tenth degree, such as Tokio Oki as
the chief villain Retsudo, who looks exactly the kung fu master who
trains The Bride in Kill Bill volume 2 (perhaps Tarantino's
principle inspiration for the character?), only he mumbles most of
his lines, gets far more excited, and continuously gazes upon his
Ogami with an unmistakably evil glint in his eyes.
If
there is anything that plagues Sword of Vengeance, it is the
story. Clocking in at a brisk 83 minutes, the director and
screenwriters invest a lot of energy in developing the background
story to Ogami and Daigoro. The flashbacks are not problematic in of
themselves, only that they eat up a lot of the running time, hence by
the time Ogami is actually sent on a mission, the film is literally
halfway done. The goal he is tasked with in this episode is
presented, explained and achieved inside of 45 minutes. The film
would have been better suited with more economical storytelling with
regards to the protagonist's background information. As it stands,
the film feels exactly like what it is: an introduction. Even the
first instalments of Marvel comic book films or Star Wars episodes
have their own stories and complete character arcs within them even
though audiences know future films will follow. For comparative
purposes, Sword of Vengeance is actually like Kill Bill,
the first volume in this case. There is much more story to tell, but
the film already knows it will not get to it all even before it has
begun, which is a bit frustrating, not to mention that, has much as
director Misumi brings vim and verve to the proceedings, he is no
Quentin Tarantino. Even if one was disappointed by the abrupt ending
to Kill Bill 1, that film at least gave the viewer a pretty
wild ride, artistically speaking.
The
Comica Obscura marathon is suddenly caught in an awkward position.
Watching more of Ogami's adventures is not a possibility because
there are other works left to discover in the months to come, meaning
that Sword of Vengeance must be evaluated on its own terms,
which itself is frustrating because it barely hides the fact that it
is the first in a series, thus giving us a clearly incomplete story.
The conclusion is that the film fine, offering some deliciously
violent moments, both in terms of action and sex, has a curious
soundtrack and a comically pudgy leading man who can tear through
just about anybody. Still, there is no purpose in hiding the fact
that Sword of Vengeance is an incomplete experience and can
never be wholly satisfactory.
Done here? Find out how Bill would offer his 'Expertise for Rent' in his review at his Movie Emporium.
Done here? Find out how Bill would offer his 'Expertise for Rent' in his review at his Movie Emporium.
1 comment:
Interesting, I definitely picked up on the grimy nature of the film, but I did feel there was a bit more to the film than that. Either way, good work, looking forward to your rebuttal.
Post a Comment