Friday, March 5, 2010

Star Wars marathon


Alright then, let's get down to business, shall we?

This Sunday will see the launch of a joint Star Wars saga marathon, featuring reviews not only here at Between the Seats, but also at two of Bill's blogs, that is, Bill's Movie Emporium and The Domain of Nihilus.

The saga will be looked at with a fine toothed comb in chronological order. Essentially, we are studying the franchise starting with Episode I, then II, then III, and so on.

On our blogs this coming Sunday you will find our individual reviews of The Phantom Menace. 7 days later, we shall publish response posts to our reviews. We may agree or disagree, I honestly don't know yet. I know Bill is a huge Star Wars, and I have some general ideas about where he lies with the individual instalments, but that's about it. Of course, any comments from you the readers are welcome as usual.

So after 2 Sundays of The Phantom Menace (reviews and then rebuttals), we then ignite our lightsabers again for Attack of the Clones (a Sunday of reviews and then a Sunday of rebuttals). So on and so forth until the climactic battle in Return of the Jedi, which I hope will prove to be more exciting than the climax in that final instalment, if I may indulge in a little review-spoiler.

You ask me if this is going to be pretty cool? I can offer only one reply:

'I know.'

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Another development.

Hello again.

This is a bit of information I could have posted a few weeks back but never got around to doing so, so I do apologize. The news in question is that yours truly is now a writer for The Reelists, a website I believe I've mentioned a couple of times before on this blog. It was started by some Filmspotting message board members and has grown a decent bit to include contributers from across the web.

In fact, The Reelists are starting to gain exposure to the point that two contributers have started the site's official podcast. Yes, they have a podcast called The Movie Dictator Club. While it is still young, I can assure you it is a quality product. So make sure to check out their site because a) It's darn good, and b) because it features my column, 'Flip Side of the Frame', in which I take a brief look at one strong and one poor performance from the same actor. The column might not appear on a weekly basis, but I hope to make it a fairly regular column on their site.

Thanks again.

Coming Soon: a 2 blogger marathon...



In cooperation with Bill from Bill's Movie Emporium, although his other blog, The Domain of Nihilus, might be used by him instead.

Whatever happened to?...

Whatever happened to that 'queer cinema' marathon? Excellent question, I'm glad you asked.

Life happened. It is as simple as that. Work, social life, etc, etc, etc. The mere fact that I posted in-depth and reasonably lengthy reviews on a rather consistent basis (6+ times a month) for 1 1/2 years surprised even yours truly himself. I honestly thought a lengthy forced hiatus on my part was going to occur way sooner in the existence of Between the Seats. Well, it happened now.

Okay, so regarding the 'queer cinema' marathon: Yes, it will still happen, but not at the pace with which the other marathons have developed up until this point, that is, a breezy 1 to 1 and 1/2 month blitz through a director's work or various movies within a single film genre. The reason being that whenever I asked readers of the blog to vote on a future marathon's topic, the more indie/art house topics always won.

That in of itself is fantastic. Even before I changed the format of Between the Seats to a strictly marathon inspired format, I think it was evident that I had an eclectic taste in film. Between the Seats was never a 'review the Friday Hollywood release' kind of blog, even though there were the occasional reviews of the recent big budget productions. The thing with an entire marathon of indie/art house films is that those movies are not necessarily easy to find. There was a time when Between the Seats was still young that your host made use of...less than legal means to acquire all those non-English language movies I reviewed. I just picked and chose what sounded interesting and clicked a button. Last autumn however, I made a commitment to stay clear of illegal downloading. As it stands, if I'm watching an art house or indie film, it's because I borrowed it from the local library or one of the local multiplexes where I live felt generous enough to play it for a few weeks.

Do you have any idea how hard it was to do that 'Female European directors' marathon?!? I'm exagerating of course, but still.

So again, the 'queer cinema' marathon will occur, please rest assured. But don't expect it to be a '1 review/week' type of marathon. Having said that, I think it is high time we get back on track here at Between the Seats. No more hiatus time. Within the next week, more reviews will start pouring in, but a bit like I did in December with the 'Long arms of the law' marathon, I'll be choosing some easier topics (movies I can easily acquire).



Two franchises will be studied in the coming weeks. The first shall be the original Planet of the Apes series. I watched the entire franchise recently and would very much enjoy spilling some of my thoughts on those films.

I think the one project that promises quite a bit will be a 2 blogger Star Wars marathon. Yes, a 2 blogger marathon. Every now and then I'll post a link to reviews writte by other bloggers I know at the end of my reviews. I'm sure you've noticed that I've posted a few links to Bill's Movie Emporium. Bill is a massive Star Wars fan. I myself used to be a good fan, but over the years my interest has waned somewhat. I haven't watched any of the Star Wars films in at least 5 years, some for an even longer time. What would I think about them now, several years onwards and with considerably different film tastes from 4-5 years ago? We'll find out in the coming weeks. The finite details of how Bill and I will work the marathon out shall be revealed soon, but we do truly want to make it a team effort, with similar formats on our blogs, to the point where it will seem that we practically watched the films in the same room and spoke about them together (impossible, as we don't even live in the same countries).

Stay tuned. Oh, and sorry for being away for so long.

Edgar Chaput.

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Review: Nine (2009)



Nine (2009, Rob Marshall)
B


I rarely watch musicals. It isn’t a genre of filmmaking that gets me excited or has ever struck my curiosity in any particular fashion. This made my reaction to the trailer to Rob Marshall’s latest grandiose and lavish production, Nine, all the more surprising, even to myself. From the moment the trailer ended with that powerful lines of ‘Be Italian’, I knew that I’d be in line for the film on opening weekend. I believe it was the audacity of the trailer which aroused my interest. It didn’t explain anything about the story, although anyone familiar with Federico’s Fellini’s 8 ½ or the Tony award winning show upon which Nine is based arguably had a relatively clear idea. In those two and a half minutes, I was transported to a world in which the arts of song, dance and filmmaking are married together to concoct tantalizing escapism. Would the actual film deliver on such a promise however?

Guido (Daniel Day-Lewis), or ‘Maestro’ as he is lovingly referred by colleagues and fans alike, is an Italian film director whose early works captured the imaginations and hearts of movie goers worldwide. Through a light and comical press conference scene, the story quickly establishes that the director’s last few efforts were not up to par, but the producers claim next outing promises to be something for the ages, something that will exemplify the very best of, what else, Italia. In fact, that is the very title of this next venture, Italia. The producer is ready, the set design crew is ready, and so is his faithful and witty costume designer, played by dame Judi Dench. The great starlet of the hour, Claudia Jenssen (Nicole Kidman) has even been attached to the project in the lead role. There is but one slight hurdle to overcome before filming can commence: a script needs to be written. Guido hasn’t the faintest idea what his story is about, and the stress begins to mount on his shoulders as the production team grow increasingly impatient. All the while, Guido takes refuge (and possibly searches for inspiration) in the many love lives he juggles, most notably with his wife Luisa (Marion Cotillard) and Carla (Penelope Cruz). Before we know it, an American magazine journalist (Kate Hudson) is also trying to seduce him. Let us not forget of course that the Maestro also has imaginary discussions with his late mother, who takes the form here of Sophie Lauren.




With a decidedly stunning cast, a director with previous experience in the genre of film musicals (he brought the 2002 Academy award winning Chicago to life) and, lest we forget, a kick ass trailer, how does Nine play out after all? To put it bluntly, the film delivers both the best and worst of musicals, or at least what fall into my definitions of best and worst qualities musicals can espouse. On a positive note, the cast is, almost without exception, irresistible. Of course, if you don’t enjoy seeing Daniel Day-Lewis, Marion Cotillard, Penelope Cruz, Judi Dench and Nicole Kidman on the screen at the same time…then I suppose you might be in trouble if you choose to see the film obviously, but I highly suspect that such a category envelopes a clear minority of movie goers. Lewis’ Italian accent took a few lines to grow accustomed to since I often find adopting Italian accents can more often produce less convincing results than adopting an American accent (naturally, I am comparing the accents the English actor adopted for his Nine and is previous work, There Will Be Blood), but all the necessary eccentricities and the ‘devil may care’ attitude of a man in Guido’s position are present. The Maestro is a man as adept, if not more so, at writing love stories for his own life than writing one for is next project. His wife Louisa used to be a fine actress and in fact saw her career be born on the set of one of Guido’s previous movies. While their love may have been the stuff of fairytales, the director’s devotion is now split between his wife and the stunning, playful and rather needy Caro. Their escapades are quite light hearted and embedded with a sexual intensity too irresistible for anybody. His life distracts him from work on this bold but empty movie project just as his work on this bold but empty movie project distracts him from life. Daniel Day Lewis brings an undeniable charm and energy to the character of Guido, which is pretty to be expected from an actor of his calibre and history of truly getting into the roles he is hired to interpret. I don’t if what Lewis practices is what film buffs and scholars describe as ‘method acting,’ but however you want to name his style, it works bloody well. While Lewis may not be as big here as he was in There Will Be Blood, there is an eccentricity to the performance reminiscent of what many of us attribute to those who are members of the artist community. Some flare, some tempers, volatile emotions and such. With a supporting cast as vast and glamorous as the one found in Nine, the film should be forgiven if not everyone feels equally important to the story and character interactions. Honestly, how does one juggle with supporting actors the likes of Penelope Cruz, Nicole Kidman, Kate Hudson, Marion Cotillard and Judi Dench? Something has to give sooner or later. Of that bunch, I’d wager that the ‘loser’ is Nicole Kidman, who only appears reasonably late in the film and, even then, for not very long. Her character, it is hinted, also had a romantic involvement of sorts with Guido, although this is never fully developed and Kidman essentially leaves as quickly as she arrived. Cruz is allotted more screen time, which is fine by me given how I’ve often thought she was a better actress, but her character is sadly a little bit typical. She is the needy, sexy little sideline thing whose emotional grip on her own husband is fast slipping and wishes to be alone with Guido, despite the fact that the latter is married. It’s a fine performance, I thought Cruz was having some good fun with the role, which works quite well otherwise the character would have felt rather bland. Cotillard is given some real emotional weight in the film however, and her performance only improves as the story moves along. Honestly, the latter part of the film does showcase some very solid moments from the French actress. Dame Judi Dench is the sassy costume designer, and in my mind Dench can practically do no wrong, so no complaints from me on that point. Hudson doesn’t appear too much, but she is alright as well. Nothing spectacular, but as the American fashion/pop culture journalist taken aback by Guido’s…sexiness? popularity? eccentricity? she is adequate. Truth be told, the more I think of it, the more her character comes off as a mediocre ploy to further test Guido’s faithfulness towards his lovely wife.



I’ve done a fair amount of chit-chatting thus far about the story and acting, but this is a musical after all, so is the music any good? Well, the reason why I saved this section of the review for later is because I am as musically inept as a 5 year old. I have little to no knowledge of what constitutes a good song, and my familiarity with the musical genre within the art of film is minimal at best. Alright then, let’s get this monster out of the way finally: the music is mostly good. There are a handful of very catchy tunes that my mind retained as I walked out of the theatre. Dench’s ‘Folies Bergères’ (for which she sings a bit in French. From the perspective of a movie goer who speaks that tongue, she has a pretty darn good accent!), Hudson’s ‘Cinema Italiano’, Cotillard’s ‘My Husband Makes Movies’ and Fergie’s (!) ‘Be Italian’ were all superb. Cruz’s ‘A Call From the Vatican’ and Sophie Lauren’s ‘Guarda la Luna’ were fine. The rest were more of a mixed bag. At times, particularly as during the songs performed by Daniel Day-Lewis and Nicole Kidman, that I felt the songwriters were trying to put too much story and explanations of emotions into the lyrics. Some verses sounded awkward in that the performers were trying to shove too many words into lines. As I wrote already, my musical competency is quite limited, so I may not be the best person to articulate these issues, but suffice to say that for the most part the songs were catchy, touching and amusing, with the few disappointing exceptions I mentioned.

The one thing that always troubles me about musicals is how the worst ones always require the movie to stop for the actors to break out into song. For a few minutes the story simply does not move forward. Nine…kind of, sort of tries to work around this but I don’t think it succeeds entirely. The musical numbers are often the emotions of what the characters are feeling at the time and provide some backstory to plotlines (as in Cotillard’s ‘My Husband Makes Movies’) while other times the songs are nicely integrated (somewhat) into the plot directly, as in Cruz’s ‘A Call From the Vatican’. Some are served through flashbacks (‘Be Italian’) or have a decidedly existential feel to them (‘Folies Bergères). Other times the movie really does stop for no reason (‘Cinema Italiano’, despite how catchy the song actually is). I guess it is a mixed bag overall.



Nine is a flashy film, filled with memorable set and costume design, handsome cinematography but sometimes mediocre editing. It features a story that rests on the shoulders of the actors and songs due to a certain lack of originality, but thankfully those two elements, acting and song, are both rather swell for the most part. I think what I felt most of all as I left the theatre was how, even though the film is imperfect, it was worth the 12 dollars. It’s pretty to look at and sounds great, kind of like real musicals performed on stage, only this time you don’t have to pay as much.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Bottom 10

Oh no, do we really need to do a bottom 10? No, but they're fun. Actually, in case none of you have noticed, I tend to write favourable reviews here at Between the Seats. Even with films I don't like by and large, I rarely, rarely think a movie is a big fat turd with no qualities.

This means the following list is not one for movies I thought 'sucked hard.' Some of them I honestly didn't like, that's true, but some are films that had redeeming qualities, but due to either the hype surrounding them or simply particular aspects of the filmmaking, I just didn't like them that much. Some I would even be willing to give half scores, or something in the nature of a C or C+, which is far from terrible. They just weren't as good as some of the other stuff I saw in 2009. Tell you what, I'll leave little indicators to specify my feelings towards each entry.

1-Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (sucked)
2-The International (sucked)
3-State of Play (irritating)
4-The Hangover (wow, terribly unfunny)
5-Adoration (good actors, disappointing outing from Egoyan)
6-I Love You, Man (terribly unfunny)
7-X-Men Origins: Wolverine (A guilty pleasure for me, but it wasn't a 'good movie')
8-Year One (flat)
9-Terminator Salvation (excellent visuals, boring story)
10-500 Days of Summer (too cutesy despite strong moments)

Top 10

Ah-ha! Where is the top 10 list however? Everybody seems to be doing them, so I felt obliged to chip in. Many apologies if this list seems 'whateva.'

1-Two Lovers
2-The Brothers Bloom
3-Thirst (which I really should have written a review for because no one will know what this is)
4-Public Enemies
5-Inglourious Basterds
6-Star Trek
7-Il Divo
8-Sugar
9-Watchmen
10-Summer Hours

Coulda, woulda and probably shoulda made the cut: The Hurt Locker, Still Walking, Red Cliff and The Limits of Control.

And if there are some movies on the list you don't know...trust me, my top 10 for '08 was even less mainstream.

Status Update

When I said the 'long arms of the law' marathon wouldn't be that long, I meant it. I never intended it to be anything lengthy, just enough to occupy readers until the New Year. I hope you enjoyed the reviews for Public Enemies, Bullitt, Dirty Harry, PTU and Touch of Evil. I loved writing them. It's a genre I'm quite comfortable with, so those 5 reviews were a breeze to write.

When the reviews return we'll begin the 'queer cinema' marathon. What I want to watch (note 'want to watch' and not 'shall watch.' Changes pending.) is Brockback Mountain, My Own Private Idaho, Happy Together, Bad Education and The Bitter Tears of Petra Von Kant...for now. Suggestions are more than welcome.

Thank you

Hello readers!

It's the holiday season, so I just wanted to take a moment to thank all those that have taken the time to visit my blog, read the reviews and in some cases even share some comments. I really do appreciate it. Lord knows there is a host of film blogs out there already, some of which are of dubious quality at best. The fact that there are followers and readers of my blog makes me feel pretty darn good. Thank you very much.

Christmas time is a time of sharing, so I shan't take the entire spotlight. There are some excellent blogs out there, many of which I visit on a regular basis (even if I don't always post comments, I do actually visit your sites people). Here are some of the blogs that were absolutely worth reading in 2009 and will probably be just as good in 2010:

The Reelists
M Carter @ the Movies
Bill's Movie Emporium
Big Thoughts From A Small Mind
Film for the Soul
Encore's World of Film & TV
Cinema Sights
Corndog Chats Cinema

If I didn't list your blog, fear not, it isn't because I deem it unworthy. It's most likely because, with all the blogs I already visit, yours is still relatively new to me and I therefore haven't gotten quite familiar with it yet. Regardless, you all know that there is a huge list of links on the right side of this page, so you all get to make the mega list anyways!


And of course, Merry Christmas and happy New Year! Joyeux Noël et Bonne Année!

'Long arms of the law' marathon: Touch of Evil



Touch of Evil (1958, Orson Welles)

The full article is now available at Sound on Sight here.